AutomatedGenealogy.com

AutomatedGenealogy Volunteer and User Forum
It is currently Thu Jul 18, 2019 7:06 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:02 pm
Posts: 28
While linking, I found the following page,

http://automatedgenealogy.com/census/Vi ... H+COLUMBIA

where it appears an intended surname correction for the domestic must have been incorrectly populated to the rest of the family (transcribed: Margaret Nicholls/proofed: Cheryl Martin). As no proofing notes remain, this is my best guess.

Could we have someone change the surname on lines 32 to 38 back to Forrest from Okasaki (line 39).

Thanks

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:31 am
Posts: 99
Done, thanks.
Gord


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:02 pm
Posts: 28
Thanks Gord,

When I didn't see any proofing notes I began to get worried. I just hope that no other errors like this exist (i.e. "post-proofing")

Cheers

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:31 am
Posts: 99
Unfortunately, there may be any number of these, just because the Surname Correction function can't handle the strays, like domestics. The transcriber who accepts the correction instead of editing the line will set this up every time.
Gord


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group