AutomatedGenealogy.com

AutomatedGenealogy Volunteer and User Forum
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:07 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fook, Lee/Dee
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:21 pm 
I believe there is a transcription error in this entry:

Fook Dee 26 British Columbia Victoria Victoria 20 41 40

http://automatedgenealogy.com/census11/ ... h+Columbia


We have evidence at the BC Archives of a Fook Lee in Victoria in the 1940's and I believe this may be the same individual. Also, Lee is a more likely transcription of the word, being a very common Chinese name. I think the first letter is an "L" rather than a "D".

Ann ten Cate, BC Archives.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fook, Lee/Dee
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:57 am
Posts: 300
Hi Ann -

I agree with you and have entered a proofreader's correction, which another volunteer will review and accept in due course.
http://automatedgenealogy.com/census11/ ... anada+page

Thanks for your input. Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fook, Lee/Dee
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 119
Correction has been accepted. Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group